Proposed Continuity

(Basic outline)

 

I.  Continuity

 

The next council (whensoever the next pope should be elected by consensus among the remnant Bishops and representative laymen) should continue the previous Council, the Vatican Council of 1869-1870 which was prorogued due to unfavourable conditions at the time; at which point deliberations will resume.

The Vatican Council ought not to be closed until certain propositions are discussed and decided upon and, as the case may be, ratified.

 

 

II.  Dogmatic

 

The schemas for the proposed Marian dogmas, "Mediatrix of All Graces" and "Co-Redemptrix", proposed at the illicit 'Second' Vatican Council (so-called because Roncalli, a.k.a. 'Pope' John 23, was no pope and had not the authority to call it), should be revived and discussed in session.

 

[ Dec. 06/25 addition: Considering St. Joseph's status as "He, that sitteth on the throne" in Apocalypse should be given first consideration before Mediatrix / Co-Redemptrix. ] 

[ Dec. 30/25 addition: The notion of 'sede remota' as the premise to explain the extended interregnum and related issues, as per The Siri Thesis: Sede Vacante Or 'Sede Remota' ? and Jurisdiction And Continuity. ]

 

 

III.  Addendum to the Syllabus of Errors   

The addendum should include, but not be limited to, the following:

The errors of Russia spoken of by Our Lady of Fatima, which are to be defined, and which will include the errors which pertain to communist ideology and its outgrowth in later years:

1.  Equality/Equalism - The founding principle behind the errors of the age, as a false god and a false religion, in an undefined but quasi-dogmatic form;

(Equality pushed to its conclusion is zero, a flatline; it means no creation. It is opposed to hierarchy, which is the principle of Creation, and is its opposite.)

2.  Evil/oppression scaled to power - Related to the previous. Also the devil's doctrine in that the more powerful is, as inexorably as a natural law (e.g. the force of gravity), more evil or oppressive by its nature. By this standard, the Most High is thus blasphemed as 'most oppressive'. It is also prejudicial, in that the alleged level of power one possesses is not scaled to one's moral or spiritual state; to declare it so is to remove moral agency from anyone, as everyone is assumed to be evil or oppressive according to this scale regardless of any other factor.

This section would be 'material' errors:

More than two sexes

Chemtrails

Carbon levels

Climate Change