Flipping The Script

In "Two Timelines Of Apocalypse Part Three" we introduced the idea of how the antichrist might engage with Apocalypse:

 

We say the antichrist will threaten their lives in the next life as well because after the sixth seal event, it will be of little use to deny that hell exists. He will use that to offer salvation to those who will adore him as their saviour. Only those who love the truth will see that he cannot do this in place of Christ, our true Lord and Saviour.

He will have to acknowledge the Apocalypse because it is no use denying it after the sixth seal event, However he will dare to contradict it, because as St. Paul has written: "This is the rebel who is to lift up his head above every divine name, above all that men hold in reverence, till at last he enthrones himself in God’s temple, and proclaims himself as God" (2 Thess. 2:4~Knox).  

 

It will also be of no use for the antichrist to deny the book of life, again because of the sixth seal event. He will probably claim to be the one who wrote it, and thus all must follow him to be in it.

Having said all that, it must be admitted that it may be completely different. For instance, the so-called 'illumination of conscience' (the part of the 'Warning' in which people see their own sins) may be denied to come from God (it does not) but this would be a double lie, if he uses this to state either that 'the devil does not want your sins forgiven' (so he highlights them per the 'Warning' as if they cannot be forgiven) or that 'the devil is accusing you for sins already forgiven'.

In other words, the antichrist might deny (truly) that it comes from God in order to (falsely and truly) claim that the devil is trying to bring people to despair, when (falsely) he is the one with the key to defeat this. The second part is called 'falsely and truly' because the devil does want people to despair of salvation outside the antichurch and the antichrist, which means to retain a false hope in them.

The way to convince people to turn away from him lies, in part, with establishing the continuity of the true Catholic Faith through the papacy from St. Peter to Pius XII, and to show the rupture afterwards. The antichrist's goal is to convince the world he has continuity with the papacy and with the rupture at the same time; this contradiction, that he has the papacy (and is, at the same time, above the papacy) simultaneously without the Faith which is its foundation is the intellectual crucifixion of the Truth which will result in the removal of one's name from the book of life. It is the same thing as saying that 'faithlessness is equal to faithfulness'; 'to be faithful one must also be faithless'; and 'to be alive is the same thing as to be dead'. It is not far from this to also say: 'to not be God is also to be God'.

The Woman And The Harlot (Apocalypse 17) But Not That Woman

They are not the same. The woman seen in the desert which "sitteth upon a scarlet coloured beast, full of names of blasphemy, having seven heads and ten horns" (Apoc. 17:3) is the Vatican city-state, established in 1929 by the Lateran Treaty, but no longer with the Faith it once contained. It is "the great city, which hath kingdom over the kings of the earth" (Apoc. 17:18). The harlot is the Vatican '2' church the world over, "who sitteth upon many waters, with whom the kings of the earth have committed fornication, etc" (Apoc. 17:1-2). The waters "at whose meeting the harlot sits enthroned, are all her peoples, nations, and languages" (Apoc. 17:15~Knox). 

The 'synodal' form of the Vatican '2' church is established and begun by Bergoglio as 'Francis I'. [1]  This is why, of the succession of the 'heads' of the beast, it is placed here at the sixth: "Five are fallen, one is, and the other is not yet come; and when he is come, he must remain a short time" (Apoc. 17:10). It is the beginning of the transition of the former Catholic church to what is to become "Babylon the great" (Apoc. 18:2), the "mother of the fornications, and the abominations of the earth" (Apoc. 17:5).

The harlot form of the new church is going to be destroyed: "And the ten horns, which the beast had in thy vision, will become the harlot’s enemies; they will lay her waste, and strip her quite bare, eat her flesh away, and then burn down what is left of her" (Apoc. 17:16~Knox). It is likely that the antichrist himself orders and permits this, as a kind of 'Great Reset': All former things must pass away (if they were Christian) to a 'new understanding' of the world. But none of the pagan things which were also former things will pass away; instead, they will be glorified. In the end, there will be naught left except all the false religions: "Babylon the great is fallen, is fallen; and is become the habitation of devils, and the hold of every unclean spirit, and the hold of every unclean and hateful bird:" (Apoc. 18:2). [2]

 

Afterwards, at some point, it is possible that the antichrist will convince the world that the formerly Christian world was meant to 'prefigure' this new world, in which every religion is true (except the one which he calls 'the former things') [3]  so that those who hold the true Faith are likened to the Jews of old who crucified their Messiah: Except this time, the antichrist promises, he will prevail and reign with them 'for a thousand years'.

That is one example of how the antichrist may be 'flipping the script' of Apocalypse itself to accuse the Faithful of being faithless.

By 'a thousand years' he will mean 'until the end of the world' and will declare that he "will never leave you, my people" or some such thing. As though he were 'Christ' of Apoc. 20:4. That is another example.

Before we continue, let us return to chapter seventeen: 

 

The woman of Apocalypse called 'Babylon the great' (Apoc. 17:5) will be 'flipped' with the Woman of the true Church (Apoc. 12:1). The Woman of the true Church fled "into the desert unto her place" (Apoc. 12:14); and the unfaithful woman called 'Babylon' is seen in the vision in the desert: "And he took me away in spirit into the desert. And I saw a woman sitting upon a scarlet coloured beast, etc" (Apoc.17:3).

 

The antichrist may liken the opposition to his church as that of the dragon (who, in this flipped script, represents the Faithful). The key to this is the short reign of the seventh (Apoc. 17:10). Whatever happens to the seventh will be blamed on the 'rebels' (those who departed the Vatican '2' church and its antipapacy) in the revolt spoken of by St. Paul: "Unless there come a revolt first, and the man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition..." (2 Thess. 2:3). These will be likened to the "third part of the stars of heaven" (Apoc. 12:4) which were cast down by the tail of the dragon; and following this, one can only conclude that the seventh will be called the one "who was taken up to God, and to his throne" (Apoc. 12:5). All of this will come about during the antichrist, who is "the eighth, who is of the seven" (Apoc. 17:11) which is the same as "the beast, which [St. John] sawest" which "was, and is not, and shall come up out of the bottomless pit" (Apoc. 17:8). And the world will wonder at this apparent resurrection "whose names are not written in the book of life from the foundation of the world" (Apoc. 17:8). 

 

In the real script: "And I saw one of his heads as it were slain to death: and his death’s wound was healed. And all the earth was in admiration after the beast" (Apoc. 13:3).

 

 

From all that, it is not very far for the antichrist to declare that he is the apparition to St. John in Apocalypse chapter one; and that his 'predecessors' (the seven heads of chapter thirteen) are actually the seven bishops spoken of by the apparition of chapter one.

It does not have to be completely logical. Indeed it cannot be; but using the power of ambiguity any twisting of the passages is possible. It is as if Apocalypse contains in itself a kind of 'two-ways' interpretation; those who believe the truth will read it one way; those who do not, will read it the wrong way to their own undoing.

To continue: It follows that if there is to be seven real sedevacantist bishops in the end, or perhaps seven individuals who are not bishops but have the leadership role nonetheless, they will be called the seven 'heads' of the beast in this flipped script.

And finally, the antichrist and his false prophet may well call themselves the 'two witnesses' (Apoc. 11:3-4). They may see themselves (or be seen) as punishing the earth for not submitting to their rule (Apoc. 11:6).

It is not known whether any of this may prove to be true; but it is a general outline of what to expect if this line is taken by the antichrist. With few exceptions, everything which has been done on this site up until now has been to bring 'up to date' the whole body of Catholic prophecy according to to this interpretation of Apocalypse. Even the things which have not yet come to pass, such as Sr. Lucia's third secret vision, has to be accounted for and placed correctly as it was a vision outside of Sacred Scripture which was nevertheless given in the past.

There are probably many more possibilities for the script to be 'flipped' as seen above. Naturally it is impossible to twist the Apocalypse in a manner which is completely coherent and logical, but for the purposes of the antichrist it will suffice. No matter what the contradictions, it may well be that many will latch onto a given point or another, and it will be enough, and they will ignore anything else (especially if they are 'trained' into accepting contradictions due to the prevailing narrative of the 'operation of error'). But for those who love the truth, or at least have an affinity for it, such contradictions will not be ignored.

 

Final notes:

The Great Reset (promoted by globalists such as Klaus Schwab) seems to be a twisted version of what the book of life may actually represent. There is a kind of reset coming, but not what they think it is.

The Book of Life will be made to seem unnecessary by the antichrist, or he will claim to be the one who wrote it: "Who opposeth, and is lifted up above all that is called God...shewing himself as if he were God" (2 Thess. 2:4).

The Vaunted Representation of the prevailing narrative today, otherwise known as 'wokeism', places much importance on what they call 'representation' (which really means 'less European'). But since the Church mas made disciples of all nations, then all "tribes and peoples and tongues and nations" (Apoc. 11:9) have their representation. But what is worse is that the antichrist will accuse Heaven of not being properly represented, not in the saints nor in the number of the saved; so Europeans will undoubtedly be called 'privileged' as well as members of the Holy Family - that is to say, the Holy Family as understood by Catholic doctrine but not by heretical doctrine. 'The real Holy Family', he might say, 'is not so perfect and privileged compared to all of you' (meaning the world). Thus the beast, given a great voice by the media, "opened his mouth unto blasphemies against God, to blaspheme his name, and his tabernacle, and them that dwell in heaven" (Apoc. 13:6).

However, the book of life makes the whole representation angle (based on the false god, equality) moot. Everybody has an equal chance based on what they did or did not do, and this was bought by the Church keeping the Faith all that time, so that the Lamb, "standing as it were slain" (Apoc. 5:6) had occasion to open the seals. So instead of being condemned the Church and the remnant ought to be praised and thanked! But alas, it will not happen (much).

A Witty Beast will probably be how the antichrist will be. Some kind of comedian who tries to make those who oppose him seem silly. That should also fit in with Apoc. 13:6. This will seduce many. We think this will be in contrast (probably by the devil's design) with the corniness of the utterances of Vatican '2' and its antipopes. Recent examples were observed as documented here and here. 

In Abrogating the Tridentine the antichrist will likely lift verses from the Apocalypse itself, in another example of 'flipping the script': What more perfect verse than "That time shall be no longer" (Apoc. 10:6) ? He will say its time is done, and past; further, he may utilize the scene just after the opening of the seventh seal, in which the angel, 'having the golden censer, offers "of the prayers of all saints upon the golden altar, which is before the throne of God" (Apoc. 8:3). [4] Afterwards, the "the angel took the censer, and filled it with the fire of the altar, and cast it on the earth, and there were thunders and voices and lightnings, and a great earthquake" (Apoc. 8:5). In this way the antichrist will 'show' that it is to no avail any longer.

Of course these verses would then be out of context but when has that mattered to people who believe 'the operation of error' which, in its operation, presents 'facts' out of context all of the time ? But in this case it will be done 'in the sight of the beast' which will seem to make sense at the time for those who have not the love of the truth.

Also we think this is a good example because it is what we would do if we were on the other side.

The Suppression of the Truth for 'the good of souls' is what the antichrist may engage in, utilizing all the A.I. at his disposal. On the other hand, we think it as likely that he would want to draw out all of his opponents, so it cannot be all suppressed everywhere at the same time as yet: "And it was given unto him to make war with the saints, and to overcome them. And power was given him over every tribe, and people, and tongue, and nation" (Apoc. 13:7). It will be both at the same time in different places over the world.

The United States is going to be destroyed according to the plan of the globalists and those of the 'New World Order'. Its people and its industriousness has been used to bring about many bad things to that end; and afterwards, the nation is planned to be discarded. But it will not happen that way, even if it does happen partially. This is a kind of false, 'preemptive fulfillment' of Apocalypse chapter eighteen: "Therefore, shall her plagues come in one day, death and mourning and famine.  And she shall be burnt with the fire...And the kings of the earth...shall weep and bewail themselves...when they shall see the smoke of her burning...Alas!  alas! that great city, Babylon, that mighty city:  for in one hour is thy
judgment come. And the merchants of the earth shall weep and mourn over her:
for no man shall buy their merchandise any more" (Apoc. 18:8-11). But it is Rome of the antichrist through which the world's economy will be controlled, when the mark of the beast becomes mandatory: "And that no man might buy or sell, but he that hath the character, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name" (Apoc. 13:17).

The Two Witnesses might even be what the two beasts of Apocalypse will claim to be. One will be able to do "great signs, so that he made also fire to come down from heaven unto the earth, in the sight of men" (Apoc. 13:13) and this will be interpreted the same as the consequences of an attack upon the two witnesses: "And if any man will hurt them, fire shall come out of their mouths and shall devour their enemies.  And if any man will hurt them, in this manner must he be slain" (Apoc. 11:5). And anyone who opposes the two beasts will be called 'followers of the beast'; but those of the world who are deceived by the antichrist will assure themselves that their 'saviour' will be victorious: "And they adored the dragon which gave power to the beast. And they adored the beast, saying: Who is like to the beast? And who shall be able to fight with him" ? (Apoc.13:4). This 'flipping of the script' is possible as not only has Apocalypse chapter eleven not been fulfilled up to that point, but it never will be. Because of this, many will look at chapter thirteen and not see it, as it happens afterwards in the ordering of the chapters.

To Co-Opt The Idea Of The Book Of Life, the antichrist might present the book of life as universal salvation (everyone being part of his church by default), whereas in truth everyone therein is out of the antichurch by default. We imagine this because it is difficult to see how he would be able to completely ignore Apocalypse, especially after the sixth seal, so he will try to 'flip the script' as it were; in this way and others.

 

So he will declare that everyone in the world is in his church except those who actively reject him. Also, to prevent people from falling out of it, through the sin of believing (the truth) those who speak against him (the sedevacantists and all others who love the truth) he offers the 'mark of the beast' as a guarantee of salvation. This would be an inversion of the truth; and also of the Brown Scapular.

As for those in the past who, by their sins, might have lost their place before it is unsealed, it is not for us to know before the end. This would be confirmed, or not, when the books are compared in the end (Apoc. 20:12-13).

 

The Mediatrix and Co-Redemptrix dogmas are not defined at this time for this reason: If there are any more Marian dogmas at this time one cannot identify the 'four living creatures' of Apocalypse properly. They are metaphorical representations of the Immaculate Conception, the Divine Maternity, Perpetual Virginity and the Assumption. If there are more or less, the four living creatures cannot be identified, and therefore the seals of Apocalypse cannot and are not being opened.

If the crisis of the Church happened before Fatima (1917) and required Divine intervention (the great monarch or the three days' darkness), then the Assumption would not have been defined (1950); then the four living creatures cannot be identified and therefore the seals are not being opened. That means the first timeline (Apocalypse chapters 10-11) is being fulfilled.

If the consecration of Russia was done with the bishops, thus fulfilling the requirements, the second crisis (the infiltration of the hierarchy) would have been averted, and the next Vatican Council (presumably closing the first properly) would have discussed and likely defined those two dogmas. If this was so, then there would be six, not four, Marian dogmas to be represented by the four living creatures; therefore in that case the four living creatures again cannot be identified and the seals will not be opened. Because that, too, would be the first timeline (Apocalypse chapters 10-11) fulfillment.

Either way, during that narrow time between the definition of the fourth (Assumption - 1950) and the non-definition of the fifth and sixth (1962-65) is the confirmation of the second timeline of Apocalypse (all the chapters except 10-11, but accounting for chapters 10-11, that no words are taken away from the prophecy - Apoc. 22:18-19).

Also, we think that there are to be defined no more Marian dogmas at least until the sanctity of St. Joseph is recognized. Beginning with recognizing him as the apparition of Apocalypse chapter one.

The Mystery of Apocalypse is done in this way, with a seeming deliberate logical error (the 'circular loop' mentioned in "Two Timelines Of Apocalypse (Part Three)" (footnotes #116 & #118), because the head of the holy family has the authority to order them to arrange it in that manner, and also to do it himself, as the apparition to St. John at the beginning of Apocalypse.

The Trinity arranged it that way first. [5] The purpose is for the devil to deceive himself.

 

At any rate, as it was deliberate, it is not actually an error, as Scripture has no error.

 

 

[ Dec.31/25 addendum ]

[Jan.2/26 Edited: The 'Accuser' (Apoc.12:10) is a reference here to both the devil and the antichrist. Essentially the antichrist is (will be) doing the equivalent of what the devil was doing as described in Apocalypse 12].

The Accuser will accuse Catholics (sedevacantists) of judging and damning everyone who are not exactly the same as themselves. Also, those former Catholics who have followed the antipopes all the way to the end (when the antichrist arrives following his seven predecessors) will have subsequently lost the Faith and will join the antichrist in condemning everyone who has kept the Faith as those who judge and damn everyone who does not. It is entirely expected that Matt.7:1-2 will be quoted against the faithful: "Judge not, that you may not be judged. For with what judgment you judge, you shall be judged: and with what measure you mete, it shall be measured to you again".
 
The thing is, when the sedevacantists keep the standard of what the Church teaches about salvation, they are keeping the teaching of the Church as opposed to the antichrist; whereas the antichrist will arrogate to himself what properly belongs to the book of life and to the Church (responsible for the book being unsealed). In other words, he does not keep Church teaching but accuses the faithful of not being faithful to the Church (represented by himself).

So to flip the script, the Accuser/antichrist accuses true Catholics of being the Accuser/antichrist (if he were to be a group collective and not an individual). True Catholics, speaking of sin, will seem as the Accuser to a world following the 6th seal event (Apoc. 6:12-17). The world will be 'blindly' seeking salvation. This is what the antichrist claims to bring - as the one whom all must follow for salvation, as if he were the Pope representing Christ - whereas the real truth is that he is the one person everyone must not follow. And the true Catholics will give all the reasons why; and the antichrist will 'flip' that by referring to sedevacantists 'the Accuser' (Apoc. 12:10), even as they rightly accuse the antichrist and his precursors of heresies and so forth. It may be further 'flipped', using Apocalypse 12, by referring to sedevacantists as allies of the devil who were 'cast out of Heaven' (Apoc. 12:9) in a metaphorical way, by - and one can hardly miss where this is going - refusing to submit to the antipopes. In a way it is circular: The sedevacantists are outcasts in a sense, in the world, and the demons are cast out of Heaven, but for entirely opposite reasons; but for those who are blind to the truth the metaphorical 'flipping the script' of Apocalypse 12 and Matt.7:1-2 (and others) will seem to make sense.
 

 

 
Footnotes

1.  The Synod is Over, Anything is Possible: Welcome to the Synodal Church (www.novusordowatch.org)

2.  When the sixth seal event comes to pass, called 'the Warning' as per Garabandal, that false prophecy to be fulfilled as some of the 'signs, and lying wonders' (2 Thess. 2:9) in service to the antichrist, the whole new church will be praying that 'the Punishment' (the first four trumpets of chapter 8) will not come to pass; but they must inevitably come to pass; it is a false hope given which will lead to the real end of the Vatican '2' church when it fails: After the seventh seal, which will be 'the Miracle' of Garabandal (but Heaven is silent during that time - Apoc. 8:1), in Heaven "another angel came, and stood before the altar, having a golden censer; and there was given to him much incense, that he should offer of the prayers of all saints upon the golden altar, which is before the throne of God. And the smoke of the incense of the prayers of the saints ascended up before God from the hand of the angel. And the angel took the censer, and filled it with the fire of the altar, and cast it on the earth, and there were thunders and voices and lightnings, and a great earthquake" (Apoc. 8:3-5). And the seven angels "prepared themselves to sound the trumpet" (Apoc. 8:4). The 'saints' in this context would be all those of good will in this situation, including all sedevacantists; but it will not avail. If, theoretically, 'the Punishment' were somehow prevented, than that would prove the false church true; if not, the blame would also fall on the false church for not being worthy, or doing enough (which will set it up for destruction as described in chapter 17). Perhaps the great sin in this case will be the guilt of not joining with the world. In that case, the state of 'Babylon the great' as described in chapter 18 becomes inevitable.

In a sense, the false prophecy of Garabandal is fulfilled one way or the other; in any case what is called 'the Punishment' must come to pass. This is a kind of inversion of Fatima, which must also be fulfilled one way or another.

3.  In this respect, the true religion will be called 'the former things' which have caused so much sorrow in the world: "And God shall wipe away all tears from their eyes: and death shall be no more, nor mourning, nor crying, nor sorrow shall be any more, for the former things are passed away" (Apoc. 21:4). Another blasphemous inversion. We think it likely that the antichrist will use this.
 
4.  In this case the 'saints' are not the elect, whom we have just seen in the preceding chapter, but are all nominal Catholics who are in church at this time, post sixth seal. At the time of this verse, they are praying to avert 'the Punishment' for the world, according to the false prophecy fulfilled, Garabandal. Of course it will not work.
 
5.  An example of a deliberate error for something to function is called 'copy protection' in early computers like the Commodore 64 and its 1541 disk drive (5.25 inch floppy disk). If it is a legal copy, then as the program is loading, it encounters a disk error; the copy protection expects this error, and if it happens, the program continues normally; if it does not encounter this error, then the program 'knows' this is an illicit copy made which did not duplicate the original disk error; and then the program will not function.

The original designer is the one with the key to the copy protection. If one wants to be fickle with this analogy then hacking can be brought up; except that no one 'hacked' the Apocalypse.

As for why we use this analogy in particular and not another there are reasons.
 
At any rate, that is the only way to describe the 'circular' arrangement of certain events in Apocalypse

Another analogy 'in the world' as it were, which comes to mind particularly from our perspective, is the character of Mr. Spock in Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan and Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country. To make a long story short, Mr. Spock is a Vulcan and among other things they are known for their logic and their abhorrence for lying. They simply do not do that. So when Khan (on the Reliant) was listening into the communications between the Enterprise and Kirk stranded on the moon, Mr. Spock's message was encoded. Before long, Lt. Saavik (Spock's protégé who was half-Vulcan, half-Romulan) said to Spock in a disapproving and disbelieving tone: "You lied"; whereupon Spock raised an eyebrow and said: "I exaggerated". Kirk then explains: "Hours instead of days! Now we have minutes instead of hours!" (for the estimated repair time to get the Enterprise functional again). This 'exaggeration' may be applied in various ways, especially to the odds of non-condemnation as stated before the book of life is unsealed. But in Undiscovered Country, there are similar utterances, in which Spock had to make excuses as to why the Enterprise was not heading back as ordered. His new protégé then, Lt. Valeris, asked him on two occasions, "a lie" ? Whereupon he responded once, "an omission" (for not giving certain details); and another time, "an error". As with the computer analogy above, an error is not actually an error if it was made deliberately. This is for the 'circular' nature of the logic of Apocalypse as we have seen. It is in the order of presentation: Of both timelines' respective events, including those which may happen for both (such as the trumpets of chapters 8-9), they cannot be paralleled simultaneously in text; it does not work that way; nor in St. John's vision. We may liken this to 'hardware limitations' of this life and of the intellect, and the difficulty of relating visions as St. John's to text. In other words, such 'hardware limitations' are in fact a feature.

These references are used because they give ideas which parallel and further develop ideas related to the Apocalypse; that is why we noticed and used them. That is also, in part, why they are there. If they were not, several ideas which have been developed here would not have got as far as they did. Signs can be in the sun, in the moon, or in the stars; or in unexpected places.