Excerpt: Section X - footnote #118 - (Daniel Chapter 12)

 

118.  The problem of how the woes can be in the first timeline when the seals are not opened therein again presents itself. We would have to assume the Assumption is defined during the 'period of peace', and then the seals are opened after the period of peace. But if the book of life were to be opened either way, why is Apocalypse arranged like this ?

Perhaps it is like the third secret of Fatima, which treats the second timeline as though there were no book of life, which is impossible (and again, this means the third secret was not intended to be revealed; but its non-revelation is the revelation). The first timeline, chapter 11, seems to indicate that the seals were indeed opened, which lead into the trumpets and final three woes; this would be the case, if not for 'that time shall be no longer' of the angel  of chapter 10 (meaning everything which came before). Chapter 11 is a stand-alone end-times scenario. It begins after the period of peace (with no seals being opened) and ends shortly before the Second Coming (no millennium). They cancel each other out somehow: If the third secret of Fatima was never meant to be revealed, because it represents an impossible scenario, then so also the first timeline end-times was never meant to be fulfilled, because it represents an impossible scenario.

 

By the way it is structured, it can be argued that neither scenario of Apocalypse is possible without contradicting the other somehow; but that is precisely the case. There can only be one; so the other is precluded, whichever is fulfilled. 

 

But the contradiction cannot be resolved before one of the two timelines is selected. Then the alternative seems to be impossible.

 

But the point is one of them was impossible all along (or not meant to be fulfilled all along). Also this cannot be known until it is very late.

 

An 'error' made deliberately is not a lie if it was intended (it was intended to keep the Revelation secret until it was time). No one was told that it was an error; but that is merely an omission. Many things are omitted which it is not necessary for us to know.

 

The Revelation was all revealed; it is all there (including the omission which is there by inference). Including the integrated 'error' (the 'circular' element mentioned in footnote #116) which itself is a part of it. In that sense, it becomes not an error, but a feature. It is part of the secret which was revealed from the beginning. That is called a paradox.

 

So the 'error' is the crossing (or even the collision) of both timelines in the text, through chapters ten and eleven. It is more of a limitation of presenting both at once in parallel although only one can be 'seen' at a time. This is why it cannot be seen accurately until one or the other timeline is selected. This is because, until then, there is not only one to be seen. This is another paradox.

Another way to illustrate this metaphorically (taken from footnote #5 in "Flipping The Script"): "It is in the order of presentation: Of both timelines' respective events, including those which may happen for both (such as the trumpets of chapters 8-9), they cannot be paralleled simultaneously in text; it does not work that way; nor in St. John's vision. We may liken this to 'hardware limitations' of this life and of the intellect, and the difficulty of relating visions as St. John's to text. In other words, such 'hardware limitations' are in fact a feature".

To continue, let us assume there was no second timeline. What would happen then ?

 

The narrative would halt in Apoc. 8:13 with the last three trumpets already described but to happen at some point in the future. Then chapter 12 would begin with no explanation. 

 

But chapter 12 begins if the Divine intervention did not happen. That means the seals were already being opened, which thus enables chapter 12's fulfillment (again, 'circular').

 

If not, then the narrative 'breaks' with chapter 11, and the sequence ends.

 

2,000 years of Catholic prophecy were leading to the Divine intervention as the 'default' timeline. If that did not change, then the Divine intervention would be required, so that chapter 10 is fulfilled: "That time shall be no longer".

 

If it is not required, then the narrative parallels with the seals' opening and chapters 12 and 13. That is when it really begins; otherwise, it is ending with chapters 10-11 following 2,000 years of Catholic prophecy after Revelation ended with St. John's vision.

 

The second timeline, then, really has two endings: The three 'woes' spoken of by the eagle of Apoc. 8:13, which does not happen yet, but holds until the very end; particularly the third woe. In this way the 'trumpets' part of the narrative does not reach chapter 10. Those woes, the last three trumpets, parallel Apoc. 20:7-11, which is the other ending. In a way, the rest of the second timeline is contained within the sequence of the trumpets' soundings.

 

But there is a third ending; or rather, the Gospel parallel ending, where the seventh trumpet and third woe is finally found. It is a 'woe' to the world but not to the faithful. 

 

 

We think there is only one who can engineer this, because though he has the 'mark' of original sin he never sinned; and he is placed highly enough in the hierarchy of Heaven to make it happen. What we mean is this not-entirely-forthright presentation of the timeline(s). It was not meant to deceive us, but meant for the deceiver to deceive himself trying to deceive everyone else. Thus, it was not meant to deceive even the adversary; but in the adversary's attempt to deceive everyone else he caused the second timeline to be enabled.

It was counted on that the adversary would take a certain course. So two timelines were presented: One which is worse than the other for those who are between them. Heaven was not bound to explain which was which; not to the adversary, and not to us, especially as They did not even make known, to us, that there were actually two of them. That was not necessary to know for salvation, although it was revealed anyway.

That is the closest we can arrive at this time to a cogent explanation of how it all happened.

 

But it is important to remember that along the first timeline, Heaven did everything They could to prevent the Divine intervention to become actually necessary, at least until the devil defeated himself in attempting to defeat the Church. We know of no other way to describe it. It is not a case of the members of the Church doing more than is necessary the whole time. No, all of their efforts were required to get to this point, and for the devil to 'overreach'.

 

If it became necessary for the Divine intervention to happen, it is because something even worse would happen if it did not (and there would be no book of life). At the same time, it was preferred that the second timeline be the one fulfilled, as the book of life is for the good of souls.