Excerpt: Section X - footnote #119 - Paradoxical time loops and Apocalypse

 

119.  Actually it (the little book, open) cannot have represented the Fatima secrets since Fatima would not actually be prophesied until 1917. However, it being part of the second timeline, it would nonetheless be annulled before it even came to be prophesied in that case. Thus the 'little book open' represents everything after chapter 11, since they are a part of the same vision. It is however a paradoxical loop either way.

To put it in brief: How can a prophecy be annulled before it had been prophesied ? The only way is to announce that there is one, but not to give details until its time had come, or it is annulled (then the details cannot be given). That is one reason for the secrets. 

The thing is, in Apocalypse, the timeline details are given, so they cannot be represented as annulled before they are given; that is why it is represented by the 'little book open'.

Does this mean, then, that the 'seven thunders' are the words of Fatima ? Not necessarily. We have seen that those thunders might speak of events of the second timeline (chapters 12-19) being prophesied even as the first timeline is being fulfilled during the 'period of peace'. They might also (or otherwise) even be speaking of the seals which were seen earlier in the vision; and thus those details might be repeated in the text if they were part of the seven thunders (it might be prophesied, for instance, that the seals will be opened after the 'period of peace'; this would certainly be in conflict with the timelines, and so the angel appears to forestall them in Apoc. 10:3; or, rather, the voices of the seven thunders appear to contradict the angel, who was showing, by his stance, just what was not going to happen: The second timeline and its two beasts. (We have said this before but it bears repeating every time there is a variation in how this question comes about.)

The words of the angel, 'That time shall be no longer', would certainly echo the words of Pius XII or his successor had the third secret been revealed. Without special revelation, it is unlikely he would speak further about it, and especially about the Apocalypse. He might have to define something in this regard - or will pointedly avoid doing so. But we do not know, and that speculation cannot go further.

In the end, if the angel's words do echo the pope's (or vice-versa, or both simultaneously) in the other timeline, then that accounts for the third secret of Fatima as it would then be revealed; then the 'little book open' being held by the angel at the same time is the Apocalypse (which shall also 'be no longer') in parallel with Fatima; and the 'seven thunders' might be members of the Church speaking of the opening of the seals after the 'period of peace' but this can no longer happen; finally, it could be that those who contradict the angel at that time would become, in time, the new heretics who would fall to antichrist when he did arrive in the first timeline, after the period of peace. And that speculation can go no further.